Jackson GIlbert Group E

Both Teddy Roosevelt and Albert Beveridge are strong supporters of American expansionism. They have slightly different reasons. Beveridge favors expansion because he believes that God has blessed the American people and it would be selfish to withhold our economic power, culture, and laws from the rest of the world. He states that, "It is a glorious history our God has bestowed upon His chosen people." It should be noted that although Beveridge uses God's gifts to America as his primary argument, he does not mention converting other people to the Christian faith. Beveridge's goal is to improve America's economic and military statuses. Roosevelt advocates expansion for the purpose of peace. He believes that America must protect herself by subduing those less civilized. This will not only protect America, it will also protect those that have been subdued. Roosevelt believes that a truly strong and righteous nation is one that advocates peace but is also prepared to fight if necessary.

I found it interesting how both Roosevelt and Beveridge had practically no respect for other "less civilized" cultures. Roosevlt believes that some "barbaric" people only respond to force. He also believes that the civilized people will always triumph over those that are less civilized. Beveridge gives practically no credit to the "uncivilized" as well. He believes that if (and when) America gains more territory, the native people should not be able to govern themselves. He compares Native Americans to children in that they are not capable in governing themselves. Both authors have valid points and I feel like they have America's best interests at heart. On the other hand, I can see how other people could easily be swept aside.